EPAM Systems vs Infosys: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
EPAM Systems (4.1/5) edges ahead of Infosys (4.0/5) overall. EPAM Systems is the better choice for enterprises wanting AI advisory paired directly with engineering delivery. Infosys is the stronger option for global enterprises needing AI advisory inside a full IT services contract. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
EPAM Systems vs Infosys: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | EPAM Systems | Infosys |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1993 | 1981 |
| HQ | Newtown, United States | Bengaluru, India |
| Team size | 62,000+ | 330,000+ |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Engineering-heavy advisory where strategists and the build team sit together | One of the world's largest IT services firms, with a dedicated London-based advisory arm |
| Pricing model | Retainer or dedicated team, enterprise contracting | Retainer, enterprise contracting |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | Python, AWS, Azure | Python, AWS, Azure |
| Industries served | Financial services, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce, Media & entertainment | Financial services, Manufacturing, Retail & e-commerce, Telecom |
EPAM Systems vs Infosys: overview
EPAM Systems
EPAM Systems was co-founded in 1993 in New Jersey and Minsk by Arkadiy Dobkin and Leo Lozner, and it's been an S&P 500 constituent on the NYSE since 2012. By the end of 2025 it employed roughly 62,850 people across more than 55 countries. Its AI advisory and transformation engineering work runs as a company-wide practice, and what separates it from a typical Big Four strategy firm is that its advisors sit directly alongside the technical staff who build what gets recommended, rather than handing off to a separate delivery team.
Infosys
Infosys was founded in 1981 and is headquartered in Bengaluru, India, employing approximately 330,429 people worldwide as of March 2026. It runs a full suite of enterprise AI advisory services, and its wholly-owned subsidiary Infosys Consulting, founded in 2004 and based in London, gives it a dedicated advisory arm distinct from the parent's much larger delivery organization.
Services and capabilities: EPAM Systems vs Infosys
| Capability | EPAM Systems | Infosys |
|---|---|---|
| AI strategy consulting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Generative AI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Machine learning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data engineering | ✗ | ✓ |
| MLOps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: EPAM Systems vs Infosys
| Framework / platform | EPAM Systems | Infosys |
|---|---|---|
| Python | ✓ | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Google Cloud | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | ✓ | ✓ |
| LangChain | N/A | N/A |
| PyTorch | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: EPAM Systems vs Infosys
| Criterion | EPAM Systems | Infosys |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Retainer | Retainer, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: EPAM Systems vs Infosys
| Dimension | EPAM Systems | Infosys |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce | Financial services, Manufacturing, Retail & e-commerce |
| Best use cases | Running an AI strategy engagement that needs to move straight into technical build with the same team., Needing a publicly-traded vendor for audit or procurement compliance reasons. | Running an AI advisory initiative as part of a much larger enterprise IT services contract., Needing a globally recognized vendor for board-level procurement approval. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Retainer |
EPAM Systems vs Infosys: pros and cons
| EPAM Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | Public-company financial disclosure that a privately held agency simply can't offer. |
| + | Advisors and builders sit together, avoiding the strategy-to-build handoff gap common at pure advisory firms. |
| + | Enough scale to run several large AI advisory and build programs across regions simultaneously. |
| + | S&P 500 membership lets enterprise procurement run standard financial due diligence. |
| - | AI advisory sits inside an enormous engineering business rather than as its own dedicated specialty |
| - | Enterprise scale generally means slower onboarding and a higher minimum than boutique agencies |
| Infosys | |
|---|---|
| + | Massive global scale, 330,000-plus employees, supports the largest enterprise AI programs. |
| + | The dedicated Infosys Consulting subsidiary adds a London-based advisory layer. |
| + | Four decades of operating history and deep enterprise procurement relationships. |
| + | Cloud and enterprise software partnerships span multiple platforms, avoiding lock-in. |
| - | AI advisory is one part of an enormous general IT services business, not a specialized focus |
| - | Scale generally means slower engagement setup than a smaller, more agile firm |
Who should choose EPAM Systems?
A typical fit: running an AI strategy engagement that needs to move straight into technical build with the same team.
Engineering-heavy advisory where strategists and the build team sit together. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce, Media & entertainment.
Who should choose Infosys?
A typical fit: running an AI advisory initiative as part of a much larger enterprise IT services contract.
One of the world's largest IT services firms, with a dedicated London-based advisory arm. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Manufacturing, Retail & e-commerce, Telecom.
Decision matrix: EPAM Systems vs Infosys
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | EPAM Systems |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: EPAM Systems (Not disclosed) vs Infosys (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | EPAM Systems |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | EPAM Systems |
Use case fit: EPAM Systems vs Infosys
| Use case | EPAM Systems fit | Infosys fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Running an AI strategy engagement that needs to move straight into technical build with the same team. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Needing a publicly-traded vendor for audit or procurement compliance reasons. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Running an AI advisory initiative as part of a much larger enterprise IT services contract. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Needing a globally recognized vendor for board-level procurement approval. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price project | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated team model | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: EPAM Systems vs Infosys
EPAM Systems (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Consulting projects. Engineering-heavy advisory where strategists and the build team sit together.
Infosys (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need needing a globally recognized vendor for board-level procurement approval. If your situation matches that, Infosys is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
EPAM Systems vs Infosys FAQ
Is EPAM Systems better than Infosys?
EPAM Systems (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. EPAM Systems's strongest advantage: public-company financial disclosure that a privately held agency simply can't offer. Infosys's strongest advantage: massive global scale, 330,000-plus employees, supports the largest enterprise AI programs.
How do EPAM Systems and Infosys differ in pricing?
EPAM Systems uses retainer or dedicated team, enterprise contracting pricing. Infosys uses retainer, enterprise contracting pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: EPAM Systems or Infosys?
Infosys is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between EPAM Systems and Infosys?
EPAM Systems's primary differentiator is: engineering-heavy advisory where strategists and the build team sit together. Infosys's primary differentiator is: one of the world's largest IT services firms, with a dedicated London-based advisory arm. They also differ in team size (62,000+ vs 330,000+), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Financial services, Healthcare vs Financial services, Manufacturing).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.